Combo class stacking.
Four-plus combo classes on one element isn't a design system. It's a maintenance bomb.
Currently booking · 3 slots
Your Webflow site isn't slow. Its architecture is.
A build quality audit for ambitious Webflow projects — focused on what determines whether your site still makes sense in year two.
The diagnosis
Most Webflow projects
fail the same four tests.
Components that aren't components.
If it only lives on the homepage, you didn't build a component. You built a screenshot.
Figma-to-Webflow as pixel matching.
Good translation preserves hierarchy, not appearance. Structure, not screenshot.
Classes named for what they look like.
.text-blue-24px breaks the moment the brand changes. .heading-section survives every rebrand.
The process
Five business days.
One report you'll actually use.
- Day 0
Intro call
30 minutes. I understand the project, your team, and what a good outcome looks like.
- Day 1
Architecture pass
Class system, components, symbols, CMS bindings. Where the build's spine is strong, where it's fragile.
- Day 2
Translation & semantics
Figma-to-Webflow fidelity, heading outline, landmarks. The details that decide whether the site survives year two.
- Day 3
Performance & SEO
Core Web Vitals, asset strategy, meta and schema. Scored against your competitive set, not a generic benchmark.
- Day 4
Prioritize & write
15–20 issues ranked by impact × effort. Each gets a refactor plan — what to change, how, and why it matters.
- Day 5
Delivery
Final report plus walkthrough. Optional 1:1 session with your team to work through the fixes live.
Audit
- Full build review
- 15–20 prioritized issues
- Refactor plan per issue
- Google Doc + Loom walkthrough
- Five business days
Most requested
Audit & Guided refactor
- Everything in Audit
- Live session with your team
- Walk-through of every fix, in the Designer
- Doubles as team training
- Async Q&A follow-up
About
Lucas Ramalho
Webflow Consultant
I lead a Webflow dev team at an Enterprise partner agency.
Senior Webflow developer for five years. I've reviewed more than thirty production projects in the last two — many of them Enterprise clients — led rebuilds on sites with forty-plus pages, and trained dev teams on reusability systems that don't fall apart at scale.
I built this offer because every agency I talk to has the same quiet problem: their Webflow site works, but every change costs hours it shouldn't. That isn't a Webflow problem. It's an architecture problem — and it's fixable.
5 yr
Senior Webflow dev
30+
Projects reviewed
Lead
Enterprise partner agency
Principles
- Architecture over appearance. Pixel matching is the easy part.
- Name by role, not by look. Classes outlive rebrands when they earn their name.
- A component isn't a screenshot. If it only lives on one page, it's not a component.
- Performance is downstream. Fix the architecture; the score follows.
Frequently asked
Straight answers
to the usual questions.
01 Why not just a performance audit?
Because a performance audit treats symptoms. LCP is slow because the architecture ships redundant classes. SEO plateaus because the heading outline is broken. The root cause is the build — that's what this audit names and fixes.
02 Who is this for?
Mid-size Webflow agencies inheriting messy projects. Enterprise teams trying to scale Webflow internally. Studios struggling with client handoffs. If you're the end client and you just want the site to look right, this isn't for you.
03 What do I need to give you access to?
Viewer access to the Webflow project and Figma source, plus a 30-minute intro call. That's it. No account takeover, no credentials shared.
04 How technical is the report?
Technical enough that your developers can act on every item without a second call. Structured enough that a PM or head of design can read the prioritization and make decisions.
05 Can you do the refactor work yourselves?
Not as part of the audit — the findings stay objective that way. If your team wants implementation help afterwards, we talk scope separately.
06 What's the pricing?
Pricing depends on site size, CMS depth, and whether you want the guided refactor session. I'll share a fixed quote on the intro call — no hourly billing, no surprise line items.
Book an intro call
Three audit slots. One honest diagnosis of your build.
Thirty-minute intro call. If the audit is a good fit, we lock scope on the call. If it isn't, I'll tell you — and point you to what is.
calendar.io / lucas-ramalho
Book call About
Audit intro — 30 min
A short conversation about your build, your team, and what a good outcome looks like.
- 30 minutes
- Google Meet or Zoom
- No prep required
April 2026
‹›
MTWT FSS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
Monday, April 20 GMT+01:00 · Lisbon
Embed placeholder — wire Calendly or Cal.com here.